The Pathway of Adopting Omnibus Law in Indonesia's Legislation: Challenges and Opportunities in Legal Reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v2i2.31524Keywords:
Legislation, Legislative Drafting, Omnibus LawAbstract
The omnibus law model has become a new method of legislative drafting in Indonesia, first applied to the Job Creation Law and later enacted as Law 11/2020. While there were no implicit guidelines in Legislative Drafting Law 12/2011, this adoption was imported from several countries like the United States and Ireland to simplify regulations before the method was subsequently formalized and included in Legislative Drafting Law 13/2022. This paper explored the pathway and dynamics of the omnibus law adoption in Indonesia's law-making procedure and analyzed its further impacts on whether such a method has fruitfully improved the quality of the enacted regulation in establishing a more friendly investment policy. Through doctrinal method, this study showed that the opportunity to apply the omnibus model in Indonesia depends on the effectiveness, success, and benefits of respective regulations. In contrast, the application of the omnibus law model should respect democratic principles and avoid public harm. As shown in three different countries, i.e., Indonesia, the United States, and Canada, public concerns on lack of participation should be taken seriously to hinder undemocratic ends through "democratic" means. Alternatively, accountability of the drafting process should be considered a priority. In summary, the increasing trend of adopting the omnibus model should be first adopted and promulgated through legislative products whose promulgation must be with a formidable law-making procedure.
Downloads
References
Anggono, Bayu Dwi, “Omnibus Law Sebagai Teknik Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Peluang Adopsi dan Tantangannya Dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia” (2020) 9:1 Rechtsvinding.
Arnstein, Sherry R, “A Ladder Of Citizen Participation” (1969) 35:4 Journal of the American Institute of Planners 216–224.
Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai, “An Introduction to the Comparative and Multidisciplinary Study of Omnibus Legislation” in Ittai Bar-Siman- Tov, ed, Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Omnibus Legislation Legisprudence Library (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021) 1.
Bayu Dwi Anggono, Perkembangan Pembentukan Undang-Undang Di Indonesia (Jakarta: Konpress, 2014).
———, Pokok-Pokok Pemikiran Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia (Jakarta: Konpress, 2020).
Bphn, Pusanev, “Dokumen Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Tahun 2019” 417.
BPHN, “Naskah Akademik Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2004”, online:<https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/na_perbh_uu_10_ 2004.pdf>.
Cedefop, “Germany: the new Recognition Act”, (17 January 2013), online: Cedefop <https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/news-and-press/news/germany-new-recognition-act>.
Darius Whelan, The Comparative Method and Law Reform (Thesis, University College Dublin, 1988).
Drexler, Ken, “Research Guides: Compromise of 1850: Primary Documents in American History: Introduction”, online: <https://guides.loc.gov/compromise-1850/introduction>.
Fitriani Ahlan Sjarif & Sony Maulana Sikumbang, eds, Aradhana Sang Guru Perundang-undangan Kumpulan Tulisan Memperingati Ulang Tahun Ke-70 Prof. Dr. Maria Farida Indrati, S.H., M.H. (Depok: FHUI, 2019).
Goertz, Johanna M M, “Omnibus or not: package bills and single-issue bills in a legislative bargaining game” (2011) 36:3/4 Social Choice and Welfare 547–563.
Historia, “Omnibus Law dari Masa Lampau”, online: Historia - Majalah Sejarah Populer Pertama di Indonesia <https://historia.id/politik/articles/omnibus-law-dari-masa-lampau-DOZww>.
Indonesia Ocean Justice Initiative, “Policy Brief V IOJI RUU Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja dan Implikasinya terhadap Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Sektor Kelautan”, online: <https://oceanjusticeinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Policy-Brief-V-IOJI-RUU-Omnibus-Law-Cipta-Kerja-dan-Implikasinyaterhadap-Pembangunan-Berkelanjutan-di-Sektor-Kelautan.pdf>.
________, "Policy Brief IV IOJI Sistem dan Praktik Omnibus Law di Berbagai Negara dan Analisis RUU Cipta Kerja dari Perspektif Good Legislation Making," online: <https://oceanjusticeinitiative.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/08/Policy-Brief-IV-IOJI-Sistem-dan-Praktik-Omnibus-Law-di-Berbagai-Negara-dan-Analisis-RUU-Cipta-Kerjadari-Perspektif-Good-Legislation-Making.pdf>.
ICLD, "Catatan Kritis Indonesian Center Of Legislative Drafting (ICLD)," (February 11, 2022), online: ICLD <https://icldrafting.id/catatan-kritis-indonesian-center-of-legislative-drafting-icld/>.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Omnibus Law Dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia (Jakarta: Konpress, 2020).
Kirchhoff, Denis & Leonard JS Tsuji, “Reading between the lines of the ‘Responsible Resource Development’ rhetoric: the use of omnibus bills to ‘streamline’ Canadian environmental legislation” (2014) 32:2 Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 108–120.
Krutz, Glen S, “Tactical Maneuvering on Omnibus Bills in Congress” (2001) 45:1 American Journal of Political Science 210–223.
———, Hitching a ride: omnibus legislating in the U.S. Congress, Parliaments and legislatures series (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2001).
Lailam, Tanto, “Analisis Praktik Penguman Formil Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945” (2011) 6:2 Pranata Hukum, online: <http://jurnal.ubl.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/161>.
Lawrence M Friedman & Grant M Hayden, American Law: An Introduction, third edition ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).
Massicotte, Louis, “Omnibus Bills in Theory and Practice” Canadian Parliamentary Review/Spring 2013.
Maria Farida Indrati, Kumpulan Tulisan A. Hamid Attamimi: Gesetzgebungswissenschaft sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Menanggulangi Hutan Belantara Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Depok: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2021).
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020”, online: <https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_mkri_8240_1637826598.pdf>.
Michel Bédard, "Omnibus Bills: Frequently Asked Questions," online:<https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/ResearchPublications/201279E>.
Muladi, “RKUHP sebagai ”Omnibus Law””, (27 November 2019), online: Kompas.id <https://kompas.id/baca/utama/2019/11/27/rkuhp-sebagai-omnibus-law/>.
OSCE, Transparency and Public Participation In Law Making Processes: Comparative overview and assessment of the situation in Macedonia (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, 2010).
_____, Transparency and Public Participation In Law Making Processes.
Peter de Cruz, Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Common Law, Civil Law dan Socialist Law, cetakan keempat ed (Bandung: Nusa Media, 2017).
Putra, Antoni, “Penerapan Omnibus Law Dalam Upaya Reformasi Regulasi”, (31 March 2020), online: Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia <https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/602>.
PSHK Indonesia, Seri Diskusi Omnibus Vol. 9: Preseden Pendekatan Omnibus dalam Reformasi Regulasi (2020).
____________, “Naskah Akademik dan Draf RUU Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan”, (2 February 2022), online: pshk.or.id <https://pshk.or.id/publikasi/naskah-akademik-dan-drafruu-perubahan-kedua-undang-undang-nomor-12-tahun-2011-tentang-pembentukan-peraturan-perundang-undangan/>.
____________, Menggagas Arah Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia: Prosiding Forum Akademik Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi 2019, PSHK Indonesia (2019), online: <https://pshk.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/PSHK_Menggagas-Arah-Kebijakan-Reformasi-Regulasi.pdf>.
Rio Christiawan, Omnibus Law, Teori dan Penerapannya (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021).
RI, Setjen DPR, “Paripurna DPR Setujui RUU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Jadi RUU Inisiatif DPR”, online:<http://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/37506>.
Roscoe Pound, Interpretations of Legal History, first paperback edition ed (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Sadiawati, Diani, Kajian reformasi regulasi di Indonesia: pokok permasalahan dan strategi penanganannya, cetakan pertama ed (Jakarta: Yayasan Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia, 2019).
Schauer, Frederick, “The Politics and Incentives of Legal Transplantation” (2000) CID Working Paper Series, online: <https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/39526299>.
Seidman, Ann & Robert B Seidman, “Instrumentalism 2.0: Legislative Drafting for Democratic Social Change” (2011) 5:1 null 95–142.
Setjen DPR RI Channel, Live Streaming - Konsultasi Publik RUU Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (2022).
Stefanou, Constantin & Helen Xanthaki, Drafting Legislation: A Modern Approach (Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2013).
United States Senate, “U.S. Senate: Clay’s Last Compromise”, online:<https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Clays_Last_Compromise.htm>.
Vincent Suriandinata, Penyusunan Undang-Undang Di Bidang Investasi: Kajian Pembentukan Omnibus Law Di Indonesia Universitas Indonesia, 2019).
Wanda Ayu, “Tiga Guru Besar UI Ini Beri Masukan Soal Omnibus Law”, (13 February 2020), online: Universitas Indonesia <https://www.ui.ac.id/tiga-guru-besar-ui-ini-beri-masukan-soal-omnibuslaw/>.
Zhuang, Shaohong, “Legal Transplantation in the People’s Republic of China: A Response to Alan Watson” (2005) undefined, online: <https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Legal-Transplantation-inthe-People%27s-Republic-of-AZhuang/d4e8c7dbdf055801ddafdf441949d03bb9841c4e>.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sulistina Sulistina, Bayu Dwi Anggono, Al Khanif, Tran Ngoc Dinh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



