Kewenangan Inheren Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Perkara Pengaduan Konstitutional dengan Objek Putusan Pengadilan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v2i1.27828Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Constitutional Complaint, Court Rulings, Inherent PowerAbstract
The authority of the Constitutional Court is often limited only to the judicial review of statutory products, not practice. The method used for this research is normative legal research using a conceptual approach, legislation, and comparisons. This legal research aims to examine the implementation of constitutional complaint schemes in various countries while reviewing the inherent authority of the Constitutional Court in reviewing constitutional complaint cases with the object of court decisions. The results show that the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea has many similarities with the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia; at the same time, the German Constitutional Court gives rights to individuals, communions, and associations to file a constitutional complaint and the United States Supreme Court establishes several criteria for legal standing for parties who make constitutional complaints. Then, the Constitutional Court has the authority to decide on constitutional objections, including court decisions, considering the court's decision is analogous to the law itself. Furthermore, based on constitutionalism, the constitutional complaint is the inherent authority of the Constitutional Court.
Downloads
References
Alexander, Larry, Constitutionalism Philosophical Foundatios (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
Alexy, Robert, “Constitutional Rights, Balancing, and Rationality” (2003) 16:2 Ratio Juris 131–140.
Asshidiqie, Jimly, Perkembangan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi (Jakarta Pusat: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2006).
Atwal, Navjosh Singh, “Doctrine of stare Decisis” (2019) 5:6 Int J Law 76–79.
Azis, Asmaeny dan Izlindawati, Constitutional Complaint dan Constitutional Question dalam Negara Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana, 2018).
Barnett, Randy E, “Judicial Conservatism v. A Principled Judicial Activism: Foreword to the ‘Symposium on Law and Philosophy’” (1987) 10:2 Harv J Law Public Policy 273–294.
Bellamy, Richard & Albert Weale, “Political legitimacy and European monetary union: contracts, constitutionalism and the normative logic of two-level games” (2015) 22:2 J Eur Public Policy 257–274.
Budiarjo, Miriam, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2018).
Daly, Paul, “The Signal and the Noise in Administrative Law” (2017) 68:3 Univ New Brunswick Law J 68–86.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad, “Dimensi Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, (2016) 13:2 J Konstitusi 406-430.
Frost, Amanda, “Judicial Ethics and Supreme Court Exceptionalism” (2013) 26:443 Georgetown Law J 445–478.
Fudin, Hanif, “Legal Justice in Presidential Impeachment Practice Between Indonesia and The United States of America” (2021) 9:3 J Huk dan Peradil 465–504.
Galleguillos, Nibaldo H., “Checks and Balances in New Democracies: The Role of the Judiciary in the Chilean and Mexican Transitions: A Comparative Analysis”, lembar akademik yang disampakan pada the 1997 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Continental Plaza Hotel, Guadalajara, Mexico April 17-19, 1997.
Ginsburg, T & M Versteeg, “Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” (2014) 30:3 J Law, Econ Organ 587–622.
Hadisoeprapto, Hartono, Pengantar Tata Hukum Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1988).
Jr, Albert Tate, “The Law-Making Function of the Judge” (1968) 28:2 LA Law Rev 211–234.
Kurland, Philip B, “The Rise and Fall of the Doctrine of Separation of Powers” (1986) 85 Mich Law Rev 592–613.
Kurnia, Titon Slamet, Sistem Hukum Indonesia: Sebuah Pemahaman Awal (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2016).
Lagi, Sara, “Hans Kelsen and the Austrian Constitutional Court (1918-1929)” (2012) 9:16 Rev Co-herencia 273–295.
Lee, Kang-Kook, “The Past and Future of Constitutional Adjudication in Korea”, (Berkeley: The Robbins Collection, 2014)
Nasir, Cholidin, “Judicial Review di Amerika Serikat, Jerman, dan Indonesia” (2020) 8:1 J Huk Progresif 67–80.
Nurwulantari, Yunita & Anna Erliyana, “Menimbang Model Pengujian Keputusan Pejabat Publik oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Korea Selatan)” (2021) 18:1 J Konstitusi 168–194.
Palguna, I Dewa Gede, Pengaduan Konstitusional: Upaya Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara (Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika, 2013)
Ridlwan, Zulkarnain, “Pengaduan Konstitusional di Negara Federal Jerman” (2011) 5:3 Fiat Justisia J Ilmu Huk 1–16.
Rugian, Irene Angelita, “Prinsip Proporsionalitas dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Perbandingan di Indonesia dan Jerman)” (2021) 18:2 J Konstitusi 461–479.
Said, Abdul Rauf Alauddin, “Pembagian Kewenangan Pemerintah Pusat-Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Otonomi Seluas-luasnya Menurut UUD 1945” (2015) 9:4 J Fiat Justisia J Ilmu Huk 577–502.
Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI, Risalah Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara RI Tahun 1945 (1999-2002) Tahun Sidang 2000 Buku Empat (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI, 2008)
Simanjuntak, Enrico, “Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia” (2019) 16:1 J Konstitusi 83–104.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat), (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo 2014)
Jr, Albert Tate, “The Law-Making Function of the Judge” (1968) 28:2 LA Law Rev 211–234.
Tim Penyusun,”Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Latar Belakang, Proses dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999-2002: Buku VI Kekuasaan Kehakiman” (Jakarta, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2010)
Zeidler, Wolfgang, “Federal Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany: Decisions on the Constitutionality of Legal Norms” (1987) 62:4 Notre Dame Law Rev 504–525.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Bagas Christofel Aruan, Umbu Rauta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
