Kriminalisasi dalam Tindak Pidana terhadap Penetapan Hasil Pemilihan Umum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v2i1.26674Keywords:
Criminalization, Criminal Act, Determination of General Election ResultAbstract
The stages of determining election results have important characteristics; because it determines the party who wins the election and, at the same time, proves the legality and legitimacy of holding the election. Nevertheless, there are various problems regarding the formulation of policies in criminal acts related to the determination of election results. This research on the formulation of criminal acts associated with election results is normative research with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. This legal research aims to discuss the formulation of the crime of 'late setting election results' and 'not determining election results; while at the same time reviewing future projections by formulating an ideal formulation regarding the formulation of the criminal act of determining election results. The results of the study state that the formulation of criminalization policies in illegal acts related to the determination of election results is regulated to meet various legal problems, including the dimensions of action, the dimensions of criminal responsibility, and the dimensions of criminal sanctions. Then, by taking references from Canada and Kenya, the projections of the formulation are prepared by specifying two objects of action, namely the act of not determining the election results and the act of being late in determining the election results as a crime. Completing the formulation was followed by a complete determination of the subject of a criminal offense accompanied by intentional errors and the formulation of flexibility-based sanctions oriented to avoiding sentencing disparities.
Downloads
References
Astuti, Pudji & Emmilia Rusdiana, Pengantar Hukum Pidana (Surabaya: Unesa University Press, 2008).
Budhiati, Ida, Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Kepastian Hukum Pemilu: Tafsir Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap UUD NRI Tahun 1945 untuk Kepastian Hukum Pemilu (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2020).
Efendi, A’An, Dyah Octorina Susanti & Rahmadi Indra Tektona, Penelitian Hukum Doktrinal (Surabaya: Laksbang Justitia, 2019).
Hamzah, Andi, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska, 2010).
Hiariej, Eddy OS, Pengantar Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Erlangga, 2009).
Sofyan, Andi Muhammad, Abd Asis & Amir Ilyas, Hukum Acara Pidana, third ed (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2020).
Afifah, Wiwik, “Tindak Pidana Pemilu Legislatif Di Indonesia” (2014) I:Pidana Pemilu Mimb Keadilan 13–28.
Alfalachu Indiantoro, Ida Yeni Rahmawati, Muridah Isnawati, “Potensi Tindak Pidana Pemilu Dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilukada Serentak Tahun 2018” (2019) 12:2 Semin Nas Dan Call Pap Fak Huk 194–201.
Aras Firdaus, “Money Politics Dalam Pemilihan Umum Oleh Badan Pengawasan Pemilihan Umum: Pengawasan Tindak Pidana Pemilu” (2020) 2:1 Justiqa 1689–1699.
Arifin, Firmansyah, “Penegakan Hukum Pemilu: Tinjauan Atas Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Pemilu 2014” (2016) 4:3 J Huk PRIORIS 348–364.
Biernat, Tadeusz, “On the Lawmaking Policy, Discretion and Importance of the Rule of Law Standards” (2020) 29:3 Stud Iurid Lublinensia 67-83.
Din, Mohd, Rizanizarli Rizanizarli & Akbar Jalil, “Model Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemilu di Provinsi Aceh yang Berkeadilan” (2020) 20:3 J Penelit Huk Jure 289–300.
Ersan, Paramita & Anna Erliyana, “Kualifikasi Hukum Pidana Khusus Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemilu/Pilkada (Tinjauan Hukum Administrasi Negara)” (2018) 4:1 Palar | Pakuan Law Rev 1–23.
Faudji, Oleh A R, “Kewenangan Kepolisian Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pemilu Di Daerah” (2015) 3:4 Lex Adm 30–38.
Fletcher, George P, “Fairness and Utility in Tort Theory” (1972) 85:3 Harv Law Rev 537–573.
Gaeta, Paola, “The Super-Normativity of International Criminal Law” (2020) 114 AJIL Unbound 82–86.
Harun, M, “Reformulasi Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pemilu Dalam Menjaga Kedaulatan Negara” (2016) 5:1 J Rechts Vinding Media Pembin Huk Nas 101–116.
Ismail, Ismail & Fakhris Lutfianto Hapsoro, “Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pemilu Dalam Perspektif Prinsip Kedaulatan Rakyat” (2019) 35:1 Justitia Pax 55-66.
Isnawati, Muridah, “The Urgence of Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) Reform to Realize Humanistic-Based Imprisonment” (2021) 3:1 Borobudur Law Rev 73–83.
Junaidi, Muhammad, “Tindak Pidana Pemilu dan Pilkada oleh Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu” (2020) 5:2 J Ius Const 220–234.
Kusuma, Lalu Sopan Tirta et al, “Peran Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum dalam penegakan hukum Pemilu (studi penanganan pelanggaran Pemilu pada Sentra Gakkumdu Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat)” (2019) 23:2 J Ulul Albab 110–116.
Liivak, Taivo & Janno Lahe, “Strict Liability for Damage Caused by Self-Driving Vehicles: The Estonian Perspective” (2019) 12:2 Balt J Law Polit 1–18.
Lodge, Anne, “Domestic Abuse, Suicide and Liability for Manslaughter: In Pursuit of Justice for Victims” (2020) 84:4 J Crim Law 273–292.
Maculan, Elena & Alicia Gil Gil, “The Rationale and Purposes of Criminal Law and Punishment in Transitional Contexts” (2020) 40:1 Oxf J Leg Stud 132–157.
Maulana, Muhammad Ihsan & Rahmah Mutiara Mustikaningsih,“Ketidakpastian Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administrasi dalam Proses Rekapitulasi Hasil Pemilu” (2019) Call Pap Eval Pemilu Serentak 2019 Bid Eval Aspek Huk Pemilu 1–19.
Muchtar, I A & A Safriani, “Tindak Pidana Pemilu Yang Dilakukan Oleh Kepala Desa Di Kabupaten Takalar” (2020) 2:November 2020 Alauddin Law Dev J 270–275.
Mulyadi, Dedi & Perspektif Demokrasi, “Dedi Mulyadi, Kebijakan Legislasi tentang Sanksi Pidana Pemilu Legislatif di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Demokrasi, Bekasi: Gramata, 2012, Hlm. 1” (1945) 1–27.
Mulyadi, Dudung, “Analisis Penerapan Bentuk-Bentuk Tindak Pidana Pemilu” (2019) 7:1 J Ilm Galuh Justisi 14–28.
Nafiah, Aniqotun & Nur Azizah Hidayat, “COVID-19 Pandemic and Simultaneous Regional Head Elections in Indonesia” (2021) 2:2 Indones J Law Soc 145–164.
Nur, Firman & M Chaerul Risal, “Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penggelembungan Suara Pemilu Legislatif Di Kabupaten Jeneponto” (2020) 2:3 Alauddin Law Dev J 445–453.
Santoso, Topo, “Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Pemilu Di Empat Negara Asia Tenggara” (2004) 34:2 J Huk Pembang 129–142.
Sarkol, Tarsisius, “Strategi Pengawasan Pelanggaran Pidana Pemilu Pada Daerah Kepulauan Maluku” (2020) 6:1 J Belo 32–47.
Sastera, I Gusti Bagus Yoga, I Made Minggu Widyantara & Luh Putu Suryani, “Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemilu di Indonesia” (2020) 1:1 J Konstr Huk 192–196.
Satria, Hariman, “Politik Hukum Tindak Pidana Politik Uang dalam Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia” (2019) 5:1 Integritas J Antikorupsi 1–14.
Stiglitz, Edward H, “The Limits of Judicial Control and the Nondelegation Doctrine” (2018) 34:1 J Law, Econ Organ 27–53.
Sugianto, Bambang, “Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Dan Bentuk-Bentuk Tindak Pidana Pemilu Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017” (2013) IX:3 J Law 1689–1699.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dwiki Oktobrian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
