Keberadaan Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Pasca Revisi UU KPK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v2i1.27842Keywords:
Corruption Eradication Commission, Supervisory Board, CorruptionAbstract
Post-Suharto era has encouraged Indonesia to give birth to various new institutions, including the existence of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Over time, various elements that support the improvement of the performance of the KPK are formed through new norms contained in laws and regulations, including the existence of the KPK Supervisory Board (Dewas KPK). This study aims to examine and analyze the duties, authorities, and urgency of the KPK Council; while at the same time examining the potential of the KPK Council as an 'inhibitory' factor in eradicating corruption. This legal research uses a conceptual approach and legislation based on primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of the study stated that although the existence of the KPK Council has the same duties as the judiciary, it actually encounters problems; because, the existing provisions give rise to inconsistencies regarding the position of the KPK Council. On the other hand, the urgency of the establishment of the KPK Council is one of the efforts to strengthen the supervision aspect of the KPK's performance in order to be able to avoid various risks of abuse of power. Furthermore, there are three factors that have the potential to become "inhibitory" factors in eradicating corruption after the existence of the KPK Council, including the obligation to wait for permits regarding the conduct of wiretapping, searches and confiscations; there is potential vulnerability to political intervention; the potential for slack in the performance of the KPK itself.
Downloads
References
Ilmar, Aminuddin, Hukum Tata Pemerintahan (Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2016).
Susanti, Dyah Octorina & A’an Efendi, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015).
Widjojanto, Bambang & Abdul Fickar Hadjar, Reformasi Dikorupsi, KPK Dihabisi: Sebuah Catatan Kritis (Malang: Intrans Publishing, 2020).
Nurisman, Eko & Risko Fitriano, “Analisis Hukum terhadap Implikasi Perubahan Undang-Undang tentang Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia” (2021) 4:2 e-Journal Komunitas Yust Univ Pendidik Ganesha 712–724.
Pranata, Taufik Halim & A Zarkasi, “Kedudukan Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan” (2021) 1:2 Limbago J Const Law 346–363.
Putriyana, Ayu & Nur Rochaeti, “The Impact of Enforcement of Corruption Law by the Corruption Eradication Commission after the Ratification of the Latest KPK Law” (2021) 21:3 J Penelit Huk Jure 299–310.
Ramadhana, Kurnia, “Menyoal Kinerja KPK: Antara Harapan dan Pencapaian” (2019) 5:2 J Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS 151–163.
Rizaldi, Moh, “Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Lembaga Negara Independen?” (2021) 12:1 Log J Penelit Univ Kuningan 21–32.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan, “Corruption and Democracy” (1996) 90 Proc ASIL Annu Meet 83–90.
Sabah AZ, Andi Febriansyah Al, “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi” (2017) 6:1 Al Daulah J Huk Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan 192–211.
Sadono, Bambang et al, “Kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di IndonesiA” (2020) 3:2 J USM LAW Rev 259–274.
Sosiawan, Ulang Mangun, “Peran Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Dalam Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Korupsi” (2019) 19:4 J Penelit Huk Jure 517–538,
Suntoro, Agus, “Penyadapan dan Eksistensi Dewan Pengawas Komisi Tindak Pidana Korupsi” (2020) 17:1 J Legis Indones 25–37
Surahmad et al, “Telaah Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Aliran Sociological Jurisprudence” (2021) 11:1 Humani (Hukum dan Masy Madani) 23–37.
Telaumbanua, Dalinama, “Restriktif Status Dewan Pengawas KPK” (2020) 8:1 J Educ Dev 258–261.
Ulum, Muhammad Bahrul, “Indonesian Democracy and Political Parties After Twenty Years of Reformation: A Contextual Analysis” (2020) 10:1 Indones Law Rev 29–44.
Umar, Olivia, “Eksistensi Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubaha Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002” (2020) 26:14 Din J Ilm Huk 1756–1764.
Wahyuningrum, Kartika Sasi, Hari Sutra Disemadi & Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, “Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi: Benarkah ada?” (2020) 4:2 Refleks Huk J Ilmu Huk 239–258.
Wiranti, Yenni & Ridwan Arifin, “Tantangan dan Permasalahan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia” (2020) 20:1 Kosmik Huk 45-55.
Wulandari, Oktavia, Muhammad Sabaruddin Sinapoy & Kamaruddin Jafar, “Izin Dewan Pengawas dalam Kewenangan Penyadapan Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi” (2020) 2:3 Halu Oleo Leg Res 172–186.
Aji, M Rosseno, “KPK Tetapkan 123 Tersangka Selama 2021”, (2021), online: nasional.tempo.co <https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1544632/kpk-tetapkan-123-tersangka-selama-2021/full&view=ok>.
Gundha, Reza, “Terima Suap dari Harun Masiku, Eks Anggota KPU Wahyu Setiawan Dieksekusi KPK”, (2021), online: suara.com <https://www.suara.com/news/2021/06/18/223727/terimasuap-dari-harun-masiku-eks-anggota-kpu-wahyu-setiawandieksekusi-kpk>.
Hidayat, Rofiq, “Gagal Geledah Kantor PDIP, Bukti Pelemahan KPK”, (2020), online: hukumonline.com <https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/gagal-geledahkantor-pdip--bukti-pelemahan-kpk-lt5e1c53b696f4c/>.
Oktaveri, John Andhi, “DPR: OTT Komisioner KPU Wahyu Setiawan, KPK Jawab Keraguan Publik”, (2020), online: kabar24.bisnis.com <https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20200109/15/1188533/dpr-ottkomisioner-kpu-wahyu-setiawan-kpk-jawab-keraguanpublik>.
Ridhwan, Naufal, “2 Tahun Lalu, Gelombang Unjuk Rasa Mahasiswa Tolak Revisi UU KPK”, (2021), online: tempo.co <https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1510065/2-tahun-lalugelombang-unjuk-rasa-mahasiswa-tolak-revisi-uu-kpk>.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Syahrum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
