Kebijakan Pencabutan Hak Politik sebagai Pidana Tambahan dalam Perkara Korupsi di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v1i1.23352Keywords:
Policy, Additional Punishment, Political Rights, CorruptionAbstract
Additional criminal to revoking political rights imposed on convicted corruption cases are referred to as extraordinary policy and efforts made in the context of eradicating the criminal act of corruption, in which corruption is categorized as an extra ordinary crime. The basis for additional criminal law deprivation of political rights is contained in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 (UU PTPK). This study aims to examine the additional criminal policy of deprivation of political rights against convicted corruption cases seen from the perspective of the purpose of punishment and the suitability of the legal basis used to apply additional crimes of deprivation of political rights against convicts of corruption. The type of research used in this study is the juridical normative research type. The methods used are the statutory approach method, conceptual approach, and case approach. Meanwhile, for data collection techniques, this study uses legal materials consisting of: a.) Primary legal materials, namely statutory regulations and court decisions; b.) secondary legal materials include legal books, legal journals and other scientific works in the field of law. The results of this study first reveal that the additional punishment for depriving political rights is not against the purpose of punishment. It reveals that the additional criminal legal basis for deprivation of political rights for convicted corruption cases should be more specific in determining the length of time for deprivation of political rights in the PTPK Law.
Downloads
References
Arief, Barda Nawawi, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, kedua ed (Jakarta: Kencana, 2017).
Astuti, Pudji & Emmilia Rusdiana, Pengantar Hukum Pidana (Surabaya: Unesa University Press, 2008).
Chazawi, Adami, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005).
Hamzah, Andi, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2014).
Marlina, Hukum Penitensier (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2016).
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitiam Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana, 2017).
Muladi, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana (Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1995).
Muladi & Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori Kebijakan Pidana (Bandung: Alumni, 1992).
Ruba`i, Masruchin, Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana (Malang: Media Nusa Creative, 2015).
Sholehuddin, M, Sistem Sanksi Dalam Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007).
Siswanta, Slamet, Pidana Pengawasan dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia (Universitas Diponegoro, 20070 [unpublished].
Soekanto, Soerjono & Purnadi Purbacaraka, Aneka Cara Pembedaan Hukum (Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 1994).
Tanya, Bernald L, Moralitas Hukum (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2014).
Anders, Gerhard, Fidelis E Kanyongolo & Brigitte Seim, “Corruption and the impact of law enforcement: insights from a mixedmethods study in Malawi” (2020) 58:3 J Mod Afr Stud 315–336.
AR, Suhariyono, “Penentuan Sanksi Pidana dalam Suatu Undang-Undang” (2008) 6:4 J Legis Indones 615–666.
Ariyanti, Vivi, “Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia” (2019) 6:2 J Yuridis 33.
Assaad, Andi Istiqlal, “Hakikat Sanksi dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Hukum Pidana Islam (Studi Tentang Pidana Mati)” (2017) 19:2 J Al-Ishlah 50–64.
Aydın-Aitchison, Andy & Ceren Mermutluoğlu, “Mapping Human Rights to Democratic Policing Through the echr” (2020) 30:1–4 Secur Hum Rights 72–99.
Gottschalk, Petter, “Private policing of white-collar crime: case studies of internal investigations by fraud examiners” (2020)
21:6 Police Pract Res 717–738.
Ibrahim, Aji Lukman, “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penjatuhan Pidana Tambahan Pencabutan Hak Memilih dan Dipilih dalam Jabatan Publik Djoko Susilo” (2014) 3:1 Supremasi Huk J Kaji Ilmu Huk 224–252.
James, Colin, “Towards Trauma-Informed Legal Practice: a Review” (2020) 27:2 Psychiatry Psychol Law 275–299.
Luthan, Salman, “Kebijakan Legislatif Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan dengan Pidana Penjara” (1995) 2:4 J Huk IUS QUIA
IUSTUM 59–61.
Mubayyinah, Fira, “Legal Review Of Indefinite Revocation Of The Political Right To Hold Public Office Against Corruption Convicts” (2019) 1:1 Prophet Law Rev 90–107.
Pane, Musa & Diah Pudjiastuti, “The Legal Aspect of New Normal and the Corruption Eradication In Indonesia” (2020) 07:02
Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 181–206.
Ramadani, Rizki & Moch Andry Wikra Wardhana Mamonto, “Legalitas Sanksi Pidana Pencabutan Hak Politik Bagi Terpidana Korupsi: Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia” (2019) 7:2 Petitum 63–71.
Rusdiana, Emmilia et al, “Hambatan Implementasi Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada Pelaksanaan Program Dana Desa di Kabupaten Gresik” (2020) 3:1 Law Dev Justice Rev 29–41.
Sabah AZ, Andi Febriansyah Al, “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi” (2017) 6:1 Al Daulah J Huk Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan 192–211.
Sitepu, Sudirman, “Penanggulangan Kejahatan Melalui Kebijakan Kriminal” (2006) 3:3 Syiar Madani J Ilmu Huk 325–335.
Sutrisno, Sutrisno, Dwi Haryadi & Jean Darc Noviayanti Manik, “Additional Punishment for Revocation of Political Rights to Corruption Prisoners in The Purpose of Punishment In Indonesia” (2020) 5:1 IJCLS Indones J Crim Law Stud 21–38.
Thielbörger, Pierre, “The ‘Essence’ of International Human Rights” (2019) 20:6 Ger Law J 924–939.
Trijono, Rachmat, “Menata Ius Constitutum Menuju Satu Sistem Hukum Nasional” (2020) 6:2 VERITAS 235–255.
Ulum, Muhammad Bahrul, “Indonesian Democracy and Political Parties After Twenty Years of Reformation: A Contextual Analysis” (2020) 10:1 Indones Law Rev 29–44.
Usman, “Analisis Perkembangan Teori Hukum Pidana” (2011) 2:1 J Ilmu Huk Jambi 62–78.
Wiranti, Yenni & Ridwan Arifin, “Tantangan dan Permasalahan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia” (2020) 20:1 Kosmik Huk 45.
Anon, “Transparency International: Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia Anjlok ke Ranking 102”, (2021), online: dw.com
Faqih, Fikri, “Indonesia Peringkat 3 Negara Terkorup di Asia, Perlu Perampasan Kekayaan Koruptor”, (2020), online: merdeka.com <https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/indonesia-peringkat-3-negara-terkorup-di-asia-perlu-perampasan-kekayaankoruptor.html?page=2>.
Hidayat, Mohammad Arief, “Mahfud: Hak Politik Anas Dicabut Tak Salah tapi Berlebihan”, (2015), online: viva.co.id
Hidayat, Rofiq, “Memahami Perbedaan Ius Constitutum dan Ius Constituendum”, (2021), online: hukumonline.com
MD, Moh. Mahfud, “Pencabutan Hak Politik”, (2014), online: nasional.sindonews.com <https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/930618/18/pencabutanhak-politik-1417243820>.
Prasetyo, Aji, “Pencabutan Hak Politik Terdakwa Kasus Korupsi di Mata Penegak Hukum”, (2019), online: hukumonline.com <https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5c4b83394dc77/pencabutan-hak-politik-terdakwa-kasus-korupsi-di-matapenegak-hukum/>.
Ramadhan, Ardito, “Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia pada 2020 Turun Jadi 37, Peringkat 102 di Dunia”, (2021), online:
Sihombing, Erwin C, “Banding Ditolak, Hak Politik Rio Capella Dicabut”, (2016), online: beritasatu.com <https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/369251/bandingditolak-hak-politik-rio-capella-dicabut>.
Sutiawan, Iwan, “KPK Tak Bisa Apa-Apa atas Putusan PK Patrice Rio Capella”, (2018), online: gatra.com <https://www.gatra.com/detail/news/341457-KPK-Tak-Bisa-Apa-Apa-atas-Putusan-PK-Patrice-Rio-Capella>.
Yuliani, Putri Anisa, “Mantan Politsi NasDem Ikut Gugat PKPU Larangan Koruptor Nyaleg”, (2018), online: mediaindonesia.com https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-danhukum/171217/mantan-politsi-nasdem-ikut-gugat-pkpularangan-koruptor-nyaleg.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Enha Sorandri Tahir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
